It's over-regulation that is bad. Trying to kill off innovation before it has any chance to flourish is bad. Like banning the automobile. Or banning PC's. Or being the one that threw water over the nascent fire...
Just feel the need to point out that it isn't MEP's coming up with these regulations; it's the EC. MEP's only get to vote on the legislation dreamt up by the un-elected EC. Which means the EU's lawmakers are unelected, a politburo. Also, you failed to mention the UK's lite-touch regulation approach; which one assumes you agree with as you complained about over-regulating EU. Finally, you state that 'Admittedly I’m quite against the overreach of government... I’m much for the idea of just leave us alone and we’ll take care of ourselves' have to ask then why did you move to the EU? The UK is a negative rights based society where the EU is a positive rights based society... It's like going to Russia and wondering why you've ended up in the Gulag.
REGULATION: Good vs Bad (Conditional)
- If AI Innovation is used:
(i) to HARM HUMANITY, whether
(a) for Mental or Physical Harm,
or
(b) for Stealing their Wealth,
. . . then, REGULATION is GOOD,
. . . BUT . . .
☆☆☆ REGULATION should be
IMPOSED by:
"WE THE PEOPLE",
(NOT THE installed GOVERNMENT),
. . . if the TRUTH and REAL PURPOSE
is made available to the Public.
(ii) if the AI Innovation will provide
BENEFITS to HUMANITY, then and
if its TRUE PURPOSE and BENEFIT
is FIRST revealed to the PUBLIC,
then, PUBLIC SUPPORT
would be OBVIOUS,
and therefore, CONDITIONALLY,
NO NEED for REGULATION!!!
(iii) The DECISIONS for REGULATION
. . . should be based on whether
for WAR or PEACE . . . or . . .
for GREED or GENEROSITY!
(iv) Revealing the
CONDITION of the HEART
of the LEADERSHIP and MEDIA
who can PROMOTE:
(a) FEAR and SCARCITY,
or
(b) God centered
"FEAR NOT" (LOVE) and
"ABUNDANCE"!
(The overwhelming EVIDENCE
in NATURE and in our
Self-healing GLOBAL ECOSYSTEM!
It's over-regulation that is bad. Trying to kill off innovation before it has any chance to flourish is bad. Like banning the automobile. Or banning PC's. Or being the one that threw water over the nascent fire...
Just feel the need to point out that it isn't MEP's coming up with these regulations; it's the EC. MEP's only get to vote on the legislation dreamt up by the un-elected EC. Which means the EU's lawmakers are unelected, a politburo. Also, you failed to mention the UK's lite-touch regulation approach; which one assumes you agree with as you complained about over-regulating EU. Finally, you state that 'Admittedly I’m quite against the overreach of government... I’m much for the idea of just leave us alone and we’ll take care of ourselves' have to ask then why did you move to the EU? The UK is a negative rights based society where the EU is a positive rights based society... It's like going to Russia and wondering why you've ended up in the Gulag.